Chiller Capacity Calculator
Input Data
Enter your project data
Chiller Configuration
Water-cooled: COP 5.0-6.5 | Air-cooled: COP 2.5-3.5
Water-cooled: 5.0-6.5 | Air-cooled: 2.5-3.5 | Magnetic: 6.0-8.0
Load and Capacity Parameters
Recommended standard: 10% safety margin
Expected operating load. Most chillers operate at 60-80% load.
Evaporator (Chilled Water Side)
Standard HVAC: 6.0°C - 7.0°C
Standard Delta T is 5.0K or 6.0K
Condenser (Heat Rejection Side)
Water-cooled only: leaving cooling tower, typically 29-30°C
Water-cooled only: entering cooling tower from chiller
Air-cooled only: outdoor design dry-bulb temperature
Fluid and Refrigerant Selection
Reference only - does not currently affect the calculation
Reference only - does not currently affect the calculation
Estimation & Operation Parameters
Calculation Results
Calculated instantly from your inputs
Chiller Capacity Selection
Chillers are the heart of HVAC cooling systems. This calculator helps engineers select the right chiller by analyzing cooling load, efficiency (COP/EER), and operating costs. Water-cooled chillers offer higher efficiency but require cooling towers and more maintenance. Air-cooled chillers are simpler but less efficient, especially at high ambient temperatures. Magnetic bearing chillers provide the highest efficiency with oil-free operation and reduced maintenance.
Key Points:
- Water-cooled chillers: COP 5.0-6.5, require cooling tower, lower operating cost
- Air-cooled chillers: COP 2.5-3.5, no cooling tower, higher operating cost
- Magnetic bearing: COP 6.0-8.0, oil-free, lowest maintenance, premium price
- Absorption chillers: Use heat instead of electricity, COP 0.7-1.2
- IPLV (Integrated Part Load Value) better represents real-world efficiency than full-load COP
- Most chillers operate at 60-80% load - select for part-load efficiency
- 5°C ΔT on chilled water is standard (7°C supply / 12°C return)
- Oversizing wastes energy; undersizing causes comfort issues
Calculation Steps:
- Enter all required parameters
- Click "Update Calculation"
- Review results and analysis
Formula Variables:
Q
Cooling Capacity
(kW)
P
Power Input
(kW)
COP
Coefficient of Performance
(-)
EER
Energy Efficiency Ratio
(Btu/W·h)
IPLV
Integrated Part Load Value
(-)
ṁ
Mass Flow Rate
(kg/s)
ΔT
Temperature Difference
(K)
PLR
Part Load Ratio
(%)